top of page

Current Affairs

Public·254 members

How one cyber-scamming syndicate used Singapore for legitimacy

The chairman of Prince Group, indicted over online scams, and his associates took advantage of Singapore’s reputation as a stable and predictable financial capital.

ree

Singapore's central business district skyline in May. (Edgar Su/Reuters)


SINGAPORE — The co-working space, up on the eighth floor of one of this city-state’s many nondescript office buildings, included a few unique perks: a pool table, karaoke room and private cigar bar.


It was also a front for about a dozen companies that helped launder money on behalf of one of the biggest transnational crime syndicates in Asia, according to U.S. prosecutors, and one that allegedly made its billions by forcing trafficked migrant workers to scam people online.


The United States and British governments this month took their most significant action against the cyberscam industry when they sanctioned Prince Holding Group, one of Cambodia’s biggest conglomerates, and its chairman, Chen Zhi, and froze their assets in…


520 Views
Ah Sam Boi Boi
Ah Sam Boi Boi
7 days ago

The Rise and Fall Of Accused Cambodian Scam Kingpin Chen Zhi

ree

For years, well-connected but mysterious tycoon Chen Zhi lived the high life. The 38-year-old Chinese billionaire accumulated luxury property around the world, including a mansion in London and designer condos in Singapore. In Cambodia, he built a real estate and business empire that included a bank and a watchmaking school producing luxury timepieces gifted to world leaders.


But Chen’s world unraveled in October 2025, when he was accused by US authorities of operating “one of the largest transnational criminal organizations in Asia.” Alongside the UK, they sanctioned Chen, his associates and related companies. Authorities also accused Prince Holding Group, the conglomerate he founded and chairs, of operating scam centers that laundered billions of dollars stolen from victims worldwide.


For months, there were few signs of Chen even as he mounted a legal counteroffensive against the US charges. Then, in a surprise twist, he was arrested on Jan. 6 in Cambodia and extradited to China for investigations.


Who is Chen Zhi?


Chen was born in China’s Fujian province in 1987. He became a Cambodian citizen in 2014 and subsequently renounced his Chinese citizenship, although China has since said he is still a Chinese national. He also holds passports from Saint Lucia, Vanuatu and Cyprus.


The since-removed website of his Singapore family office described him as a “young business prodigy” who got his start setting up gaming centers in Fujian province’s capital, Fuzhou. He began investing in real estate in Cambodia in 2011, and later founded Prince Holding Group, a Cambodia-based conglomerate whose interests span entertainment, finance and supermarkets.


ree

Chen became politically well-connected in Cambodia, serving as an adviser to the country’s former leader Hun Sen and his son and current Prime Minister Hun Manet. He also advised other senior figures, including former deputy premier and interior minister Sar Kheng and Heng Samrin, the former president of Cambodia’s lower house. Chen was also granted the honorary title of a “Oknha” — roughly equivalent to a lord — typically awarded to those who have made significant financial contributions to the state.


According to US prosecutors, Chen, who also goes by the name Vincent, has lived in Singapore, Taiwan and the UK, where he has numerous assets.


What is Prince Holding Group?


Prince Group grew into a major property conglomerate in Cambodia after it was founded in 2015, buoyed by a real estate boom driven by an influx of Chinese cash. Among its most high-profile projects is a $16 billion, 934-hectare development — now known as the Bay of Lights — being built near the southwestern coastal city of Sihanoukville. Prince Group has received investment from, and formed partnerships with, several multinational firms to develop and operate hotels at the site.


ree

The group also claims to have “over 100 businesses in Cambodia” spanning sectors beyond property, including tourism, logistics and technology. It runs Prince Bank Plc., which began as a micro-financing firm in 2015 and grew within a decade into a mid-sized commercial bank, holding about 4.67 trillion riels ($1.2 billion) in deposits at the end of 2024. The group has also previously claimed to have owned local airline Cambodia Airways.


Through its charitable arm, the Prince Foundation, the group established Prince Horology, a watchmaking school that produced luxury timepieces. Some were gifted to world leaders, including then-US President Joe Biden and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, during a regional summit in 2022.


What scams is Prince Group accused of?


US prosecutors allege that Prince built and operated at least 10 scam compounds in Cambodia, where thousands of migrant workers were forced to work in tightly guarded conditions under threats of violence.


The company is accused of specializing in so-called “pig-butchering” scams, in which fraudsters pose as investment advisers or attractive people on social media and messaging apps, slowly cultivating trust — akin to fattening a pig for slaughter. Victims are often emotionally manipulated for weeks or months before being persuaded to hand over money on false pretenses, such as promised investment returns or fabricated pleas for financial help. Fraudsters frequently string victims along by showing fake gains, prompting the victims to send additional funds before the money is siphoned off and the scammers disappear.


US authorities said Chen kept ledgers on Prince Group’s facilities, including one complex that allegedly ran multiple scam operations across different floors and buildings, ranging from investment scams targeting victims in the US to fraudulent orders in Vietnam. These schemes were highly lucrative: one of Chen’s accused co-conspirators later boasted that in 2018 Prince Group earned more than $30 million a day from pig-butchering and related criminal activities.


US prosecutors also allege that Prince Group relied on criminal networks around the world to siphon cash, including one in Brooklyn, New York, that laundered more than $18 million stolen from US victims. Chen is accused of instructing his associates to use “sophisticated cryptocurrency laundering techniques,” such as separating funds across numerous digital wallets before reconsolidating them, obscuring their origins. Chen’s associates are also accused of bribing public officials in multiple countries, including China, to avoid enforcement actions.


ree

How did Prince Group’s scams unravel?


Early cracks in Prince Group’s image began to show in 2020, when courts in China started prosecuting and convicting scam mules with connections to the group, as well as associates accused of facilitating online gambling, which is illegal in mainland China. Authorities in Beijing went as far as setting up a taskforce to investigate Prince Group, which a Chinese court labeled an “enormous online gambling syndicate.” Prince Group previously claimed the convictions stemmed from unauthorized individuals “impersonating” the company.


Scrutiny intensified from 2024 onward, after reports by Radio Free Asia and other media outlets detailed the group’s alleged scam activities. The allegations were strenuously denied by Prince Group, which enlisted a Singapore law firm to counter them. That firm, Duane Morris & Selvam LLP, told Bloomberg in November it no longer represented Prince Group, and earlier denials it helped issue have been removed from Prince’s website.


Authorities in Taiwan and Singapore have also said they began investigating Chen’s network before sanctions on him and his related companies were announced in mid-October, which brought the saga to a head.


What sanctions does Chen and Prince Group face?


In October, the US Treasury Department imposed sweeping financial sanctions on Chen and the Prince Group network, designating the conglomerate as “a transnational criminal organization.”


The measures bar individuals and companies in the US from conducting business with them and cover 146 individuals and business entities in total. They also effectively cut Prince Group off from the global financial system, since most international banks avoid transactions involving US-sanctioned parties. The US Treasury Department said the action would dismantle Prince’s global reach, extending as far as the Pacific nation of Palau, where the group was allegedly working with known organized-crime facilitators to lease an island and develop resorts.


Chen himself faced additional consequences. He was criminally charged in the US with wire-fraud conspiracy and money-laundering conspiracy, tied to allegations that he directed Prince Group’s forced-labor scam operations across Cambodia.


The UK imposed parallel sanctions, though it targeted a narrower set of associates and companies in Chen’s orbit, and froze UK-linked assets, including Chen’s London properties. South Korea followed with its own sanctions in late November, marking the country’s first such action against a foreign scam network. Authorities in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand and Singapore have also frozen or seized assets — including a yacht — held by Prince Group, Chen and his associates, and several arrests have also been made in connection with the case.


How much wealth did Chen accumulate?


Chen once boasted of being worth as much as $60 billion, according to a report in The Times, citing one of Chen’s former staff. While there’s been no independent verification of that figure, ample evidence points to considerable wealth.


A major component was cryptocurrency. US authorities described it as a “record” seizure when they announced in October that they had confiscated of 127,271 Bitcoin, worth about $15 billion at the time, from accounts controlled by Chen. That was in addition to stakes in listed companies and a global portfolio of assets in the UK, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Japan. Those holdings included a £100 million ($134 million) office building in London’s old financial district and luxury condominiums in Singapore. In Singapore, two family offices linked to Chen lost tax exemptions after the sanctions were announced.


The wealth was matched by an extravagent lifestyle. Chen traveled in high-end vehicles, including a black Mercedes-Maybach with the vanity plate “5555.” Prince Group also frequently hosted lavish events, including aboard NONNI II, a 53-meter (174-foot) luxury superyacht.


What has happened to Chen and Prince Group?


When Chen was charged in October, US authorities said he was “at large.” Despite his public disappearance, he appointed a top US law firm, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, to challenge the legality of the seizure of his Bitcoin holdings.

Prince Group initially went silent after the US sanctions were announced, but later issued a statement on Nov. 11, saying it “categorically rejects the notion” that it or Chen had engaged in any unlawful activity. It called the allegations “baseless” and said they appeared “aimed at justifying the unlawful seizure of assets worth billions in dollars.”


Chen’s associates mounted a legal effort in Singapore to unfreeze cash held in bank accounts linked to Chen’s various firms, but the bid was rejected by a judge in January.


Initially after the US and UK sanctions were imposed, Cambodia’s Interior Ministry spokesman Touch Sokhak told the Associated Press that Prince had met all legal requirements to operate in Cambodia and that the government was not accusing Chen or the group of wrongdoing.


That position later shifted. Cambodian authorities said Chen was arrested on Jan. 6 along with two other Chinese nationals and extradited to China for investigation, following months of cooperation between the two nations. Officials said the arrests were made at the request of Chinese authorities “within the scope of cooperation in combating transnational crime.” Cambodia’s interior ministry also said it revoked Chen’s Cambodian citizenship in December, without addressing his honorary titles. Cambodia’s central bank also announced that Prince Bank would be liquidated, barring it from accepting new deposits.


Despite prosecuting lower-level Prince associates, Chinese authorities had not, until January, directly addressed the US and UK allegations against Chen. China’s cybersecurity agency had, however, accused the US government of orchestrating the hacking of the Bitcoin that American authorities say was tied to Chen’s illicit proceeds.


But then on Jan. 8 — after dramatic footage aired on Chinese state media showing an arrested Chen being flown back to China — the country’s main law enforcement body, the Ministry of Public Security, said it had detained Chen, describing him as the kingpin of a “major transnational gambling and scam syndicate.” It said it had investigated Chen’s group and suspected it of committing “numerous crimes,” including setting up illegal casinos, conducting scams and illegal business operations and concealing the proceeds of crime. It also said law enforcement would issue wanted notices for an initial group of key figures within Chen’s criminal enterprise.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-09/who-is-alleged-cambodian-scam-kingpin-chen-zhi-and-how-did-he-make-money

This is probably how MAS will censure DBS for the recent massive outage

ree

784 Views
西廠
西廠
Jul 05, 2023

Human error over coding led to 6-hour disruption of DBS banking services in May: SM Tharman


ree

SINGAPORE — A disruption to DBS Bank’s digital banking and ATM services on May 5, 2023 was due to human error in coding the program used for system maintenance, Parliament was told on Wednesday (July 5).


In a statement at the time, DBS had blamed the over six-hour disruption, the second to hit the bank in two months, on "a systems issue". It did not mention human error at that time.


Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam provided an update on the issue in response to questions filed by Member of Parliament (MP) for Jurong Group Representation Constituency (GRC) Tan Wu Meng.


Dr Tan asked about the cause of the May disruption, and what is being done to strengthen the reliability and resilience of retails banks with significant market share here, especially in relation to digital banking services.


In his response, Mr Tharman, speaking on behalf of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, said that DBS' preliminary investigation showed that human error caused a significant reduction in system capacity.


This affected the system’s ability to process internet and mobile banking, electronic payment and ATM transactions, said Mr Tharman, who is also Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Monetary of Authority Singapore (MAS) chairman.


Mr Tharman added that according to DBS, the cause of the incident was unrelated to the earlier March 2023 disruption, which was caused by inherent software bugs.


He said that DBS convened a special board committee to oversee the root cause investigation and a comprehensive review of the bank’s IT resilience following the March 2023 incident.


Following the May incident, MAS then tasked the committee to extend its review to cover the latest incident and to use “qualified independent third parties” for the review.


“The MAS has stated publicly that it regards this second disruption within a period of two months as unacceptable, and that DBS had fallen short of MAS’ expectation for banks to deliver reliable services to their customers,” Mr Tharman said.


He added that MAS' move to impose additional capital requirements on DBS reflects the seriousness with which MAS views the recent disruptions and the impact that they have had on customers.


“MAS may vary the size of the additional capital requirement imposed on the bank and take other regulatory actions depending on the outcome of ongoing reviews," he said.


“MAS requires all retail banks in Singapore to ensure that their mission critical systems supporting digital banking are resilient. This includes having the ability to recover quickly from any system disruptions,” he said.


Mr Tharman said that banks are subject to regular inspections and off-site reviews by MAS to ensure their adherence to regulatory requirements and expectations.


More details on the disruptions will be provided by the bank publicly when the review is completed, he added.


TODAY has sought comment from DBS.


https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/human-error-dbs-banking-disruption-tharman-2205506

    2026 © All Rights Reserved | PROLIFIC SKINS

    No part of this website may be reproduced, transmitted, copied, modified or adapted without express and prior written consent of the site administrator, unless otherwise indicated for stand-alone materials.

    Any commercial use/distribution pertaining to content published on this website is likewise strictly prohibited without explicit approval accorded by the site administrator. All other logos, products, services and company names mentioned within the PROLIFIC SKINS website are trademarks of their respective owners and subject to relevant copyright laws, foreign or domestic.

    For clarifications regarding other sharing-related concerns, Kindly reach out at one's convenience.

    bottom of page